Maksim Topchilo

25
policy 001-169-215235/26 · expat EXP-003739 · Tbilisi, Georgia
Approvedstep 6 of 9

Adequacy

step 6 of 9 · medical_adequacy · 0:49 · adequacy 82 / 100 · routing_hint continue
Approved

Runs only when the claim has medical items — whether the treatment was justified.

Verdict
82adequateconfidence 0.78

Workup and treatment match the recorded diagnosis; nothing ordered outside the indication.

Provider penalty
not appliedNo cheaper in-network provider was suggested to the insured before treatment, so no penalty is available.
Step 5 context
91% over · score 91 level high
Findings
ADEQUACY_OKgreen

Cardiology consultation, echocardiography, Holter/ECG and the related panels are clinically plausible for documented tachycardia, palpitations and weakness.

NO_DUPLICATE_SERVICESgreen

No billed service appears twice across the two visits, and nothing was billed that the report does not describe.

HIGH_COST_CONTEXTorange

Step 5 reports high overpricing on the same episode. That is a price signal about this clinic's tariff and does not by itself make the services medically inadequate.

→ Open step 5
Two steps, one claim, opposite verdicts
Step 5 · Price
BLOCK — 91% above estimate
overpricing score 91, level high, action fraud_queue
Step 6 · Treatment
OK — adequate, score 82
confidence 0.78; step 6 records step 5's 91% itself and does not act on it

Both are right. The set of procedures is appropriate; what this particular clinic charges for that set is not. Presenting them side by side is what lets an operator resolve it in seconds instead of reading two step outputs and reconciling them mentally.

Step 6 decided
Approved
Adequacy
ADEQUACY_OK — workup matches the recorded diagnosis
Provider penalty
none applied